Legal Opinion

Frey v. Corbin

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 24, 1948No. Civ. No. 7436PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeek, J.

By his complaint plaintiff sought to have declared his tenancy as a subtenant of defendants in certain business property located in the city of Vallejo, and that defendants be estopped to deny his tenancy during the term of his alleged lease. Defendants answered denying generally the allegations of plaintiff’s complaint, and sought damages and restitution of the premises, as stated in their cross-complaint, for the alleged failure of plaintiff to pay the increased rental demanded of him in defendants’ notice of change in the terms of plaintiff’s tenancy theretofore served upon him by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Notten v. MensingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Levin v. SaroffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  3. Losson v. BlodgettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Monarco v. Lo GrecoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Berkey v. HalmCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  3. Monarco v. Lo GrecoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Ruinello v. MurrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Ruinello v. MurrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API