Progressive American Insurance v. Vasquez
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ORR, Justice.
In this case, we are asked to decide, inter alia, the threshold issue of whether N.C.G.S. § 20-279.21 of the Financial Responsibility Act requires a commercial excess liability policy to offer separate uninsured and underinsured motorist (“UM” and “UIM,” respectively) coverage in addition to what is offered by the underlying policy.
On 1 April 1994, defendant Aetna Casualty & Surety Company (now known as Travelers Casualty and Surety Company) issued a “Business Auto Coverage Policy” (“BAP”) and a separate “Commercial Excess Liability Insurance Policy” to “T.A. Loving Company.” The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Moore v. Hartford Fire Insurance Company GroupSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Harris v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
- Manning v. FletcherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
- Isenhour v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
- Aills v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Greenfield v. Cincinnati Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2007
- Lunsford v. MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2014
- Hlasnick v. Federated Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. GurleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Blake v. ThorntonOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.