Lunsford v. Mills
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BEASLEY, Justice.
The primary issue in this appeal is whether an insured may, in a situation in which there is more than one at-fault driver responsible for the accident causing the insured’s injuries, recover under his or her underinsured motorist (UIM) policy before exhausting the liability insurance policies of all the at-fault drivers. We conclude that the insured is only required to exhaust the liability insurance coverage of a single at-fault motorist in order to trigger the insurer’s obligation to provide UIM benefits. Accordingly, we affirm the Court of Appeals’ decision on this issue.…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- In Re the Will of JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2008
- Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. Westchester Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- Burgess v. Your House of Raleigh, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
- In Re Appeal of the Greens of Pine Glen Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2003
- Hyler v. GTE Products Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- In re B.O.A.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2019
- Kent Stahle v. CTS CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016
- Midrex Technologies, Inc. v. N.C. Department of RevenueSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2016
- Wilkie v. City of Boiling Spring LakesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2018
- Secretary, U.S. Department of Labor v. Robert N. PrestonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.