Legal Opinion

Lunsford v. Mills

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 19, 2014No. 385PA13PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEASLEY, Justice.

The primary issue in this appeal is whether an insured may, in a situation in which there is more than one at-fault driver responsible for the accident causing the insured’s injuries, recover under his or her underinsured motorist (UIM) policy before exhausting the liability insurance policies of all the at-fault drivers. We conclude that the insured is only required to exhaust the liability insurance coverage of a single at-fault motorist in order to trigger the insurer’s obligation to provide UIM benefits. Accordingly, we affirm the Court of Appeals’ decision on this issue.…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. In Re the Will of JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2008
  2. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. Westchester Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  3. Burgess v. Your House of Raleigh, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  4. In Re Appeal of the Greens of Pine Glen Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2003
  5. Hyler v. GTE Products Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1993

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. In re B.O.A.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2019
  2. Kent Stahle v. CTS CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016
  3. Midrex Technologies, Inc. v. N.C. Department of RevenueSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2016
  4. Wilkie v. City of Boiling Spring LakesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2018
  5. Secretary, U.S. Department of Labor v. Robert N. PrestonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API