Legal Opinion

Manning v. Fletcher

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 8, 1989No. 492PA88PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEYER, Justice.

In this case, we decide whether an insurance company’s underinsured motorist coverage obligation can be reduced by payments made to the injured insured pursuant to the Workers’ Compensation Act. We conclude that it can be so reduced.

On 13 March 1985 plaintiff Arthur Manning was injured in an automobile accident during the course and scope of his employment. Plaintiff and his wife, Lugene Manning, brought suit against defendant Clarence Fletcher. At the time of the accident, Fletcher had liability insurance with State Farm Insurance Company in the amount of $25,000, and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Montedoro v. City of Asbury ParkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980
  2. South Carolina Insurance v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co. v. BangSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Ohio Casualty Group v. OwensCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  3. Sproles v. GreeneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  4. Hieb v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  5. Antley v. Nobel InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API