Legal Opinion
Isenhour v. Universal Underwriters Insurance
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided September 8, 1995No. 47PA94PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRYE, Justice.
On 29 April 1989, plaintiff Dallas Isenhour was injured when the vehicle he was operating collided with a vehicle driven by Willie Kate Clark. The vehicle Mr. Isenhour was operating was owned by his employer, Far East Motors, Inc. [hereinafter Far East Motors], and was a covered automobile under a multiple-coverage fleet insurance policy purchased by Far East Motors. The fleet policy was issued by defendants, Universal Underwriters Insurance Company and Universal Underwriters Group [hereinafter Universal].
On 12 March 1990, Dallas and Sandra Isenhour instituted an action against…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Allstate Insurance Co. v. Shelby Mutual Ins. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Sutton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
- Doto v. RussoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. ChantosSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- Moser v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- United National Insurance v. DePrizioIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
- Hlasnick v. Federated Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Insurance Co. of State of Pa. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2009
- Isenhour v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
- Progressive American Insurance v. VasquezSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.