Legal Opinion

Aills v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 2, 1988No. 8714SC653PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

Summary judgment is appropriately entered where the materials before the trial court “show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that any party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” Johnson v. Insurance Co., 300 N.C. 247, 266 S.E. 2d 610 (1980).

The underlying question is what was the scope of the under-insured motorists coverage of plaintiff Mr. Aills’ insurance policy with defendant. The facts are not in dispute. On 21 July 1983 Mr. and Mrs. Lovell R. Aills, plaintiffs herein, were severely injured in an automobile accident. The other driver was at…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Phoenix Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Grant v. Emmco InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  3. Stanback v. Westchester Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Murray v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  2. Baxley v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  3. Barney v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
  4. North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. GurleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  5. Progressive American Insurance v. VasquezSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API