Legal Opinion

City of Raleigh v. Morand

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 11, 1957No. 449PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenny, J.

The appellants took no exceptions to the findings of fact or the conclusions of law entered pursuant thereto in the court below. Hence, no exceptions having been taken to the admission of evidence or to the findings of fact, such findings are presumed to be supported by competent evidence and are binding upon appeal. Goldsboro v. R. R. 246 N.C. 101, 97 S.E. 2d 486; James v. Pretlow, 242 N.C. 102, 86 S.E. 2d 759; Beaver v. Paint Co., 240 N.C. 328, 82 S.E. 2d 113; Donnell v. Cox, 240 N.C. 259, 81 S.E. 2d 664; Wyatt v. Sharp, 239 N.C. 655, 80 S.E. 2d 762. Likewise, since no exceptions were taken…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. City of Goldsboro v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  3. City of Raleigh v. FisherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  4. James v. PretlowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  5. Holmes v. City of FayettevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. A-S-P Associates v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Helms v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  3. Schloss v. JamisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  4. In Re MarkhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  5. County of Durham v. AddisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API