Legal Opinion

In Re Markham

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 14, 1963No. 676PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.

The question presented by respondents’ appeal, as stated in the briefs, is this: “May a decision of the Durham City Council, reached after public hearing in accordance with the zoning lordinances and statutes, not to amend its existing zoning ordinance so as to change certain property located in Residence and Apartment Residence Zones to a Commercial Business Zone, be reviewed directly iby the Superior Court by means of Certiorari directed to the City Council, in the absence of statutory provision for such procedure?”

“At common law and under the practice in most jurisdictions, the writ of…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Lee v. . Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  2. Pue v. . Hood, Comr. of BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  3. Northwood Properties Co. v. Royal Oak City InspectorMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Helms v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  5. Belk's Department Store, Inc. v. . Guilford CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Blades v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. Fallin v. Knox County Board of CommissionersTennessee Supreme Court · 1983
  3. A-S-P Associates v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  4. Jackson v. Guilford County Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  5. State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. Lumbee River Electric Membership Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1969

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API