Legal Opinion
County of Durham v. Addison
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided June 12, 1964No. 665PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.
Under Durham County’s zoning ordinance, effective January 16, 1956, the county is divided into “eighteen (18) classes of districts,” one being “Village Residence District.” Defendant’s property, described below, is in a “Village Residence District.”
In 1954, defendant purchased “one big lot,” “a narrow strip of land,” fronting 409 feet on the northwest (referred to for convenience as north) side of East Geer Street (Old Oxford Highway) and extending north between approximately parallel lines to the right of way of a railroad. The depth on the west side was approximately 75 feet and on the east…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Helms v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- In Re Appeal of ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- In Re Pine Hill Cemeteries, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Jarrell v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT FOR CITY OF HIGH POINTSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- City of Raleigh v. MorandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- A-S-P Associates v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Jackson v. Guilford County Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- Godfrey v. Zoning Bd. of Adjustment of Union CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- Capricorn Equity Corp. v. Town of Chapel Hill Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
- Yancey v. HeafnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.