Legal Opinion
Sheppard v. North Orange County Regional Occupational Program
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 23, 2010No. G041956PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FYBEL, J.
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff James Sheppard was a part-time instructor employed by defendant North Orange County Regional Occupational Program (NOCROP). NOCROP was created by four public school districts. During his employment, Sheppard was required to spend 20 minutes of unpaid time preparing for every hour he *294spent teaching. Sheppard sued NOCROP and sought compensation for his unpaid preparation time by asserting claims for violation of the minimum wage law, pursuant to the Industrial Welfare Commission’s (IWC) wage order No. 4-2001 (Wage Order No. 4-2001)1 and Labor Code section…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Zelig v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Martinez v. CombsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Miklosy v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- Kern v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Wells v. One2One Learning FoundationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Retired Employees Ass'n of Orange County, Inc. v. County of OrangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- Guerrero v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Bluford v. Safeway Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2013
- Oman v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2020
- Morales v. 22nd District Agricultural Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.