Pinder v. Employment Development Department
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Troy L. Nunley, United States District Judge
This matter is before the Court pursuant to Defendants Employment Development Department (“EDD”), Richard Rogers and David Derks’s (collectively hereinafter referred to as “Defendants”) Motion for Summary Judgment or, alternatively, Summary Adjudication. (ECF No. 50.) Plaintiff Frank Pinder (“Plaintiff’) opposes Defendants’ motion. (ECF No. 58.) Defendants have filed a reply. (ECF No. 60.) The Court has carefully considered the arguments raised by the parties. For the reasons set forth below, Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment or,…
2Cases cited84 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Altemus v. Amazon.com ServicesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2024
- Burns v. BrandSafway Solutions, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2024
- Devine v. ShulkinDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
- Dickson v. Travelers Casualty Insurance Company of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2025
- Dorsett v. MogensenDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2023
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.