Morales v. 22nd District Agricultural Ass'n
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
AARON, J.
This appeal addresses a collective action alleging nonpayment of overtime, as required by state law under Labor Code 1 section 510 and federal law under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (FLSA; 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq.). We conclude that the trial court properly entered judgment for defendant on the FLSA claim. Defendant proved the amusement or recreational exemption (29 U.S.C. § 213(a)(3); the amusement exemption) as an affirmative defense and plaintiffs failed to show error in the denial of their nonsuit motion, in the jury instructions, in the verdict form or in the…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Barrentine v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Corning Glass Works v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Arnold v. Ben Kanowsky, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Soule v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1994
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Julian v. Mission Community HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Potter v. Alliance United Ins. Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Ward v. Tilly's, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Morales v. 22nd Dist. Agric. Ass'n, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Christopher J. McBee v. Raytheon Technologies IncorporatedDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2024
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.