Legal Opinion

Campbell v. Regents of University of California

California Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 2005No. S113275PublishedCited by 125 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CHIN, J.

In this action, we address whether an employee of the Regents of the University of California (the Regents) must exhaust university internal administrative remedies before filing suit in superior court for retaliatory termination under either Government Code section 12653, subdivision (c), or Labor Code section 1102.5, sometimes called the “whistleblower” statutes. We conclude the exhaustion rule requires university employees to exhaust university administrative remedies before proceeding to suit. We therefore affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeal.

I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Appel…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Police Dept. of Chicago v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Abelleira v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Schifando v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Rojo v. KligerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Hamilton v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by125 opinions

  1. Miklosy v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Chavez v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Reynolds v. BementCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Graham v. Bank of America, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2014
  5. Neveu v. City of FresnoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2005

120 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API