Legal Opinion

Williamson v. Government Employees Insurance

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 14, 2011No. 090608383; A145095PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.

Plaintiff appeals a supplemental judgment denying her attorney fees, challenging the trial court’s rejection of her exceptions, ORS 36.425(6), to the arbitrator’s denial of her fee petition. The trial court sustained the arbitrator’s determination that plaintiff had no entitlement to attorney fees under ORS 20.080 and further held that, because plaintiff had not invoked ORS 20.082 as a possible ground for fee entitlement before the arbitrator, that ground was not cognizable before the trial court on its review of plaintiffs exceptions. We agree with the trial court’s reasoning and,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Staley v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  2. Rymer v. ZwingliCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  3. Foust v. American Standard InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  4. Briggs v. LamvikCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  5. Mitchell v. City of St. PaulCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kobold v. Good Samaritan Regional Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  2. Robinson v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  3. Johnson v. O'Malley Bros. Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API