Legal Opinion

Robinson v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 16, 2016No. 130913689; A156910PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDevore, J.

This case requires that we revisit the insurer’s exemption under ORS 742.061(3) from the insured’s attorney fees when the insured has rejected the insurer’s timely offer to arbitrate the claim. Plaintiff appeals a judgment awarding her uninsured motorist benefits but denying her recovery of attorney fees. The trial court denied her recovery of fees because it concluded that, under ORS 742.061(3), defendant Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District (Tri-Met) satisfied the exemption from plaintiffs attorney fees, which is available when, in writing, an insurer accepts coverage, offers to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Comcast Corp. v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Grisby v. Progressive Preferred InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Grisby v. Progressive Preferred InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Zimmerman v. Allstate Property & Casualty InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Marsh v. DavidsonOregon Supreme Court · 1973

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Berger v. Safeco Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  2. Koenig v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  3. Morat v. Sunset Vill., LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  4. Thoens v. Safeco Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  5. Berger v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API