Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. City of St. Paul

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 5, 2001No. 99C-16115; A113140PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, J.

In this breach of contract action, the arbitrator awarded plaintiffs damages and costs, but not attorney fees. Plaintiffs filed exceptions to the denial of attorney fees, arguing that they were entitled to fees under ORS 20.080. The trial court denied the exceptions. Plaintiffs appeal. We review for errors of law, Schwarzkopf v. Shannon the Cannon’s Window, 166 Or App 466, 468, 998 P2d 244 (2000), and affirm.

The following facts are not disputed. Plaintiffs own property in St. Paul, Oregon. In reliance on an oral promise by the city council to reimburse them, they made improvements to a gravel…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Davis v. O'BRIENOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Holcomb v. SunderlandOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Colby v. LarsonOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Johnson v. WhiteOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Steele v. a & B Automotive & Towing Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Williamson v. Government Employees InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API