Legal Opinion
Rymer v. Zwingli
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided February 16, 2011No. C052168CV, C044437CV A131131 (Control), A131132PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.
In this consolidated appeal, the Rymers appeal a general and supplemental judgment in a lien foreclosure and contract case (the contract case) and a supplemental judgment in an Unlawful Trade Practices Act (UTPA) case (the UTPA case) in favor of The Light Up Company (Light Up), raising a total of four assignments of error. First, they contend that the trial court erred in foreclosing Light Up’s construction lien against a surety bond rather than against the Rymers’ real property because they had not provided Light Up with notice of the surety bond, as required by ORS 87.078(1). We reject that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mulier v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 2001
- In re the Marriage of PageCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
- Attaway, Inc. v. SafferCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
- Hogue v. HogueCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- Bruce v. Cascade Collections, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Page v. ParsonsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- Moyer v. Columbia State BankCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
- Anderson v. DRY CLEANING TO-YOUR-DOOR, INC.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- FountainCourt Homeowners' Ass'n v. FountainCourt Development, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- Peace River Seed Co-Operative, Ltd. v. Proseeds Marketing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.