Roscoe Littlefield v. County of Humboldt
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SIGGINS, J.
Sheriff’s deputies seized and destroyed approximately 1,500 pounds of marijuana under cultivation in a remote area of Humboldt County (the County). Plaintiffs Roscoe, Sylvia, Richard and Timothy Littlefield and Jeffrey Libertini, each of whom has a written physician’s recommendation for up to two ounces of marijuana per day, sued the County for conversion and violation of their constitutional and statutory rights to be free from unreasonable search and seizure and deprivation of property without due process. On cross-motions for summary judgment, the trial court found the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Oliver v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Michigan v. DeFillippoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Hester v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- People v. MowerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- People v. One 1941 Chevrolet CoupeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Call v. BadgleyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2017
- Organics v. Cnty. of San DiegoDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2018
- Reiter v. Sonoma County Sheriff's Dept. CA1/5California Court of Appeal · 2014
- Round Valley Indian Tribes, et al. v. Matt Kendall, et al.District Court, N.D. California · 2026
- Snowden v. County of CalaverasDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.