Legal Opinion
Call v. Badgley
District Court, N.D. California
Decided May 19, 2017No. Case No.15-cv-03353-HSGPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN PART AND REMANDING REMAINING STATE LAW CLAIMS
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR., United States District Judge
Plaintiff Jason Call brings this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and California law *1056against Humboldt County and individual officers employed by the State of California, Humboldt County, and the City of Eureka (collectively, “Defendants”), following the execution of a search warrant at his home.1 Pending before this Court are two motions for summary judgment filed by the State of California defendants, Dkt. No. 77, and the Humboldt…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Organics v. Cnty. of San DiegoDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2018
- (PS) Andrades v. City of Manteca Police Dept.District Court, E.D. California · 2024
- (PS) White v. City and County of West SacramentoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
- Anderson v. Contra Costa CountyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022
- Danny McDowell v. Walmart Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.