Legal Opinion
Round Valley Indian Tribes, et al. v. Matt Kendall, et al.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided June 16, 2026No. 1:25-cv-03736Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 EUREKA DIVISION 7 8 ROUND VALLEY INDIAN TRIBES, et al., Case No. 25-cv-03736-RMI 9 Plaintiffs, ORDER ON MENDOCINO 10 v. DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO STRIKE AND/OR DISMISS 11 MATT KENDALL, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 75 12 Defendants. 13 14 Pending before the court is Defendants Mendocino County and Sheriff Matthew Kendall’s 15 (“Mendocino Defendants”) Motion to Strike or, in the alternative, Dismiss the Second Amended 16 Complaint (“Motion to Strike”). (Dkt. 75.) Plaintiffs have filed their opposition to the Motion, 17 along with a…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Michael Henry Ferdik v. Joe Bonzelet, SheriffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Manzarek v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.