Legal Opinion
Pacific West Cable Co. v. City of Sacramento, Cal.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided August 8, 1988No. Civ. S-83-1034 MLSPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MILTON L. SCHWARTZ, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Pacific West Cable Co. (“Pacific West”), filed this action on September 9, 1983, against the City of Sacramento and the County of Sacramento pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging a violation of the first amendment to the United States Constitution, violations of Sections I and II of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1 and 2, and violations of Article I, Section 2 of the California Constitution. The antitrust claims were dismissed pursuant to defendants’ motion, which was heard on April 20, 1984, and plaintiff proceeded to trial on…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Crawford Fitting Co. v. J. T. Gibbons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re Toys "R" US-Delaware, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2014
- Harman v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Finkelstein v. BergnaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1992
- United States v. City and County of San FranciscoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1990
- In Re GireUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.