Legal Opinion
In re Toys "R" US-Delaware, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided January 17, 2014No. MDL No. CV 08-01980 MMM (FMOx); Nos. CV 06-08163 MMM (FMOx), CV 08-06645 MMM (FMOx)PublishedCited by 69 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*444ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND GRANTING MOTION FOR INCENTIVE AWARDS
MARGARET M. MORROW, District Judge.
On December 21, 2006, Nicola Edwards and James Schley filed an action against Toys “R” Us (“Toys”), alleging that it had violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1681 et seq.1 Specifically, plaintiffs asserted that Toys had violated the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act (“FACTA”), which requires that “no person that accepts credit cards or debit cards for the transaction of business shall print more than the last…
2Cases cited72 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. AgyeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- In re Linkedin User Privacy LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Spann v. J.C. Penney Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2016
- Rodriguez v. Danell Custom Harvesting, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2018
- Spann v. J.C. Penney Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2016
- (CONSENT) Bykov v. DC Transportation Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2020
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.