Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Gire

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California

Decided September 29, 1989No. 19-10334PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ON FEE APPLICATIONS BY LAW OFFICES OF MELVYN J. COBEN

CHRISTOPHER M. KLEIN, Bankruptcy Judge.

These are two fee applications that are ordered consolidated at the request of the applicant for purposes of decision. One is made in the applicant’s capacity as counsel for the debtor in possession and the other as counsel to the committee of unsecured creditors. Common questions of law and fact justify consolidated treatment.

The first application is entitled Motion For Order Approving And Authorizing Payment Of Interim Compensation Of Attorneys’ Fees and is filed in counsel’s capacity as…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Goldfarb v. Virginia State BarSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. In Re RobertsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 1985
  3. Jordan v. Multnomah CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  4. In Re RobertsDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1987
  5. In Re Coastal Equities, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In Re Maui 14K, Ltd.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Hawaii · 1991
  2. In Re Financial News Network Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1991
  3. In Re Lotus Properties LPUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 1996
  4. Barton Business Park Associates v. Alexander (In Re Barton Business Park Associates)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 1990
  5. In Re Jaimalito's Cantina Associates Ltd. PartnershipDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API