Legal Opinion
United States v. City and County of San Francisco
District Court, N.D. California
Decided September 25, 1990No. C-84-7089 MHP, C-84-1100 MHPPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PATEL, District Judge.
These consolidated actions alleging constitutional and statutory violations arising from racial discrimination and harassment in employment practices were settled pursuant to a Consent Decree filed May 20, 1988. The matter is now before the court on plaintiff-intervenors’ motion for an award of attorneys’ fees under 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(k). Having considered the submissions of the parties, the court awards fees as set forth below.
BACKGROUND
These consolidated employment discrimination actions were brought by the United States and various individuals and…
2Cases cited81 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Texas State Teachers Ass'n v. Garland Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Moreno v. City of SacramentoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Davis v. City and County San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Davis v. City & County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Finkelstein v. BergnaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1992
- Cotton ex rel. McClure v. City of EurekaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2012
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.