Legal Opinion
Finkelstein v. Bergna
District Court, N.D. California
Decided October 2, 1992No. C 83-5125 TEH-(SC), C 84-1391 TEH-(SC)PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE: OBJECTIONS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RE: ATTORNEYS’ FEES
CONTI, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Both Plaintiff Julius L. Finkelstein (“plaintiff”) and Defendants Louis P. Berg-na and the County of Santa Clara (“defendants”) object to the findings and recommendations of Magistrate Judge Wayne D. Brazil filed on July 31, 1992 (the “Recommendations”). As Chief Judge Henderson has recused himself from consideration of these motions, the matter has been referred to this court.
II. FACTS
This fee dispute is (apparently) the final episode in a lengthy litigation that…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- City of Burlington v. DagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. AgyeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Crawford Fitting Co. v. J. T. Gibbons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Children's Hospital & Medical Center v. BontaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- 569 East County Boulevard LLC v. Backcountry Against the Dump, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2016
- Eaves v. County Of Cape MayCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Harvey v. MohammedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Lopez v. San Francisco Unified School DistrictDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2005
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.