Legal Opinion
Calderon v. Kane
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 21, 1995No. A067726PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KING, J.
In this case we are called upon to consider the consequences of the voluntary dismissal of a postarbitration request for a trial de novo. A judicial arbitrator’s award was issued in favor of Susan Kane and Theodore Abbott (Kane) in a case brought by Miriam G. Calderon and Orlando Espinoza (Calderon). Calderon, the losing party, then sought a trial de novo. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1141.20.) Thereafter, Calderon voluntarily dismissed tiie action without prejudice. (§581, subd. (b)(1).) Calderon challenges the trial court ruling which concluded that the action’s dismissal triggered…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Do It Urself Moving & Storage, Inc. v. Brown, Leifer, Slatkin & BernsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Herbert Hawkins Realtors, Inc. v. MilheiserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- In Re Marriage of SillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Lyons v. WickhorstCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- Harris v. BillingsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Quan v. Truck Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Perez v. GrajalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Mesa Shopping Center-East v. O HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Corell v. Law Firm of Fox and FoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Lee v. KwongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011