Quan v. Truck Insurance Exchange
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ZEBROWSKI, J.
The trial court in this case sustained, without leave to amend, a demurrer by defendant and respondent Truck Insurance Exchange (insurer) to a second amended complaint (SAC) for declaratory relief, breach of insurance contract, and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing 1 brought by plaintiffs and appellants James W. Quan and Lucita L. Quan (insureds.) 2
Because the SAC reveals no potential that the insurer could be liable to indemnify its insureds for any of the claims presented in the underlying action, we affirm. In the published portion of this…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
- Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
- Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Careau & Co. v. Security Pacific Business Credit, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1990
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Delgado v. Interinsurance Exchange of the Automobile Club of Southern CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- Total Call International, Inc. v. Perless InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Jordan v. Allstate InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- ACS Systems, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Fire Insurance Exchange v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.