Legal Opinion

In Re Marriage of Siller

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 20, 1986No. Civ. 24317PublishedCited by 30 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SIMS, J.

Civil Code section 4370 1 allows a trial court in a marital dissolution proceeding to award pendente lite attorneys’ fees to a spouse, payable by unrelated third parties who have been brought into the dissolution action by joinder. (Statutory references are to the Civil Code unless otherwise indicated.) In this case, we hold the statute was constitutionally applied when unrelated third parties were ordered to pay a wife pendente lite attorneys fees to compensate her attorneys for their successful opposition to various motions and writ petitions filed by third parties.

Appellants…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Dombrowski v. PfisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Arnett v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. White v. New Hampshire Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Metromedia, Inc. v. City of San DiegoSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Tobe v. City of Santa AnaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Kaufman & Broad Communities, Inc. v. Performance Plastering, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
  3. In re TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Proposition 103 Enforcement Project v. QuackenbushCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  5. City of Costa Mesa v. SofferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API