Legal Opinion
Herbert Hawkins Realtors, Inc. v. Milheiser
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 25, 1983No. Civ. 28364PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WORK, J.
The sole issue is whether plaintiffs Herbert Hawkins Realtors, Inc., Robert P. Irish and Di Anna Bennett (Realtors) are entitled to voluntarily dismiss their breach of contract action without prejudice after having requested a trial de novo following a judicial arbitration award favoring defendants Richard D. and Kathleen Milheiser. The Milheisers appeal the prder denying their motion to amend the order of dismissal to one with prejudice, and awarding costs. They assert this issue must be answered in the negative “to preserve the integrity of the judicial arbitration process .…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Justus v. AtchisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- People Ex Rel. Younger v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Wells v. Marina City Properties, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1981
- City of Costa Mesa v. McKenzieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Terminal Plaza Corp. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- People v. GamezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Perez v. GrajalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Planned Parenthood Affiliates v. Van De KampCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Weidenfeller v. Star & GarterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.