Legal Opinion

Harris v. Billings

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 29, 1993No. B056811PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

EPSTEIN, J.

The principal issue in this case is whether a plaintiff whose action is assigned to a trial court delay reduction program, and against whom no affirmative relief is sought, generally retains the right to voluntarily dismiss the action without prejudice prior to trial. We conclude that this plaintiff retained that right, and that the trial court acted in excess of its jurisdiction when, sua sponte and without notice, it vacated the dismissal without prejudice and entered an order dismissing the lawsuit with prejudice.

Factual and Procedural Summary

In October 1989, appellant…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wells v. Marina City Properties, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Goldtree v. SpreckelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Associated Convalescent Enterprises v. Carl Marks & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1973
  4. Herbert Hawkins Realtors, Inc. v. MilheiserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  5. Viejo Bancorp, Inc. v. WoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Gogri v. Jack in the Box Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
  2. Mary Morgan, Inc. v. MelzarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  3. Cravens v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  4. Brown v. Dessert Christian CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. Cano v. GloverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API