Mesa Shopping Center-East v. O Hill
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
IKOLA, J.
“[T]he party prevailing on the contract” in a breach of contract action is entitled to recover reasonable attorney fees if the contract “specifically provides” for such recovery. (Civ. Code, § 1717, subd. (a); see Code Civ. Proc., § 1033.5, subd. (a)(10)(A).) But “there shall be no prevailing party” if “an action has been voluntarily dismissed” (Civ. Code, § 1717, subd. (b)(2)), something plaintiffs may do without prejudice before “the actual commencement of trial” (Code Civ. Proc., § 581, subds. (b)(1), (c)).
We are faced with applying these rules in a context not yet…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Santisas v. GoodinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Wong v. JingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Coast Plaza Doctors Hospital v. Blue CrossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Kyle v. CarmonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- H. D. Arnaiz Ltd. v. County of San JoaquinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Baker v. Italian Maple Holdings, LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Gassner v. Stasa, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- BMO Bank N.A. v. Bring Transport Inc, et al.District Court, E.D. California · 2025
- Catlin Ins. Co. v. Danko Meredith Law FirmCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
- Cole v. HammondCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.