Legal Opinion

Mesa Shopping Center-East v. O Hill

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 23, 2014No. G049205PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

IKOLA, J.

“[T]he party prevailing on the contract” in a breach of contract action is entitled to recover reasonable attorney fees if the contract “specifically provides” for such recovery. (Civ. Code, § 1717, subd. (a); see Code Civ. Proc., § 1033.5, subd. (a)(10)(A).) But “there shall be no prevailing party” if “an action has been voluntarily dismissed” (Civ. Code, § 1717, subd. (b)(2)), something plaintiffs may do without prejudice before “the actual commencement of trial” (Code Civ. Proc., § 581, subds. (b)(1), (c)).

We are faced with applying these rules in a context not yet…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Santisas v. GoodinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. Wong v. JingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  3. Coast Plaza Doctors Hospital v. Blue CrossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  4. Kyle v. CarmonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  5. H. D. Arnaiz Ltd. v. County of San JoaquinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Baker v. Italian Maple Holdings, LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  2. Gassner v. Stasa, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  3. BMO Bank N.A. v. Bring Transport Inc, et al.District Court, E.D. California · 2025
  4. Catlin Ins. Co. v. Danko Meredith Law FirmCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
  5. Cole v. HammondCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API