Robinson v. Templar Lodge No. 17
California Supreme Court
Motions in the Supreme Court to dismiss appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.
The motion of respondent to dismiss the appeal, notice of which was served and filed in the superior court on the fifth day of November, 1895, upon the ground that no undertaking on said appeal was ever filed, is granted, and said appeal is dismissed without prejudice to another appeal.
Respondent has also made a motion to dismiss the appeal, the notice of which appears on page 127 of the printed transcript, upon the grounds that the notice was served on December 31, 1895, and that neither the notice nor the undertaking was filed until January 6, 1896. These grounds are not tenable. The notice…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Boyd v. BurrelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- Noonan v. NunanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Galloway v. RouseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
3Cited by7 opinions
- Alford v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- San Francisco Law & Collection Co. v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- People v. MaloneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Buhman v. Nickels & Brown Bros.California Court of Appeal · 1905
- Bruce v. PopeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.