Niles v. Gonzalez
California Supreme Court
MOTION to dismiss appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order refusing a new trial. D. K. Trask, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
The respondent moves to dismiss appeals taken by the defendants Lillian L. and M. G. Gonzalez from the judgment and from an order denying a motion for a new trial.
The principal ground for the motion is that the defendant Jennie R. Tarr is an adverse party on both of said appeals and that no notice of either of the appeals by the defendants Gonzalez was served on said Jennie R. Tarr. On the appeal from the order denying the motion for a new trial the further point is made that no undertaking on appeal has been filed, and that, while the filing of such undertaking has been waived by the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ryer v. RyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Johnson v. Phenix InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- In re Estate of BullardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Dalzell v. Superior Court of San Benito CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- San Francisco Law & Collection Co. v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Shelton & Luck v. SydnorSupreme Court of Virginia · 1920
- Bell v. San Francisco Savings UnionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Niles v. GonzalezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Pacific Live Stock Co. v. Ellison Ranching Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1930
- Pauley v. CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.