Legal Opinion

Environmental Defense v. Leavitt

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided August 3, 2004No. CIV.A. 03-1737(RMU)PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Denying Ceed’s Motion to Intervene; Granting the Parties’ Motions to Enter Consent Decree

URBINA, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Environmental Defense, an environmental organization, brings suit against the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”), alleging that EPA failed to carry out its responsibilities under the Clean Air Act (“the CAA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 7401 et seq., to promulgate regulations that provide guidelines and requirements for Best Available Retrofit Technology (“BART”) for sources of air pollution that contribute to haze in national…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. WetzelSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. American Corn Growers Association v. Environmental Protection Agency, State of Michigan, Department of Environmental Quality, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
  3. Cobell, Elouise v. Norton, Gale A.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
  4. Sugar Cane Growers Cooperative of Florida v. VenemanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
  5. Roeder v. Islamic Republic of IranCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Peters v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  2. Sierra Club v. Van AntwerpDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
  3. Defenders of Wildlife v. JacksonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  4. National Parks Conservation Ass'n v. JewellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  5. County of San Miguel v. MacDonaldDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API