Legal Opinion
Sierra Club v. Van Antwerp
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 4, 2007No. Civil Action 07-1756(RCL)PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, District Judge.
Now before the Court comes putative intervenors, Sierra Properties I, LLC, Pasco 54, LTD, Pasco Ranch, Inc., and JG Cypress Creek LLC’s (“Intervenors”) motion [8] to intervene under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24. Plaintiffs do not oppose permissive intervention pursuant to Rule 24(b). Upon consideration of the parties’ filings, the applicable law, and the facts of this case, the Court finds that the motion to intervene will be GRANTED.
Upon deciding to grant Intervenors’ motion to intervene, this Court next considers defendants’ motion…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- American Dredging Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Taylor v. ShinsekiCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- Center for Environmental Science Accuracy and Reliability v. National Park ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Oceana v. Bureau of Ocean Energy ManagementDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- United States v. 8 Gilcrease Lane, Quincy Florida 32351District Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Gulf Restoration Network v. JewellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.