Legal Opinion
County of San Miguel v. MacDonald
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 21, 2007No. Civil Action No. 06-1946 (RBW)PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WALTON, District Judge.
On November 14, 2006, the plaintiffs, the County of San Miguel, Colorado and nine conservation, birding, and governmental-accountability organizations, mostly non-profit, filed a complaint pursuant to the Endangered Species Act (“ESA”), 16 U.S.C. § 1540(g)(1)(C) (2000) and the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), 5 U.S.C. §§ 702, 706 (2000), challenging the defendants’ (Julie MacDonald,1 Dick Kempthorne,2 and H. Dale Hall3) determination that listing the Gunnison sage-grouse as “endangered” or “threatened” under the ESA is “not warranted.”1 (“Compl.”)…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Babbitt v. United Farm Workers National UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Wildearth Guardians v. SalazarDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Defenders of Wildlife v. JacksonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Forest County Potawatomi Community v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Center for Biological Diversity v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- In Re ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT SECTION 4 DEADLINE LITIGATIONDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.