Kimball's Case
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtBarnes, J.
The case at bar arose under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, upon petition of Florence E. Kimball, to secure compensation for the loss of her husband, John A. Kimball, who died after a highway collision on the eighth day of October, 1932. *194The Commissioner dismissed the petition. Pro forma ruling of the lower court sustained the ruling of the Commissioner and the widow took her appeal. The facts seem to be as follows, at the time of the collision, and from November, 1930, thereunto, the deceased, John A. Kimball, was in the regular employ of the Ham Realty Company, a corporation, as a collector…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bourne v. WhitmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
- Haddock v. Edgewater Steel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
- In re RaynesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
- Stevens v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1931
- Parrish v. . Armour Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Meador v. Hotel GroverMississippi Supreme Court · 1942
- Oliver v. Wyandotte Industries CorporationSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
- Webb v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1950
- Abshire v. City of RocklandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
- Gordon v. Maine Reduction Company, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.