Legal Opinion
Claim of Hospers v. J. Hungerford-Smith Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 15, 1920PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Award affirmed on the authority of Matter of Klein v. Stoller & Cook Co. (220 N. Y. 670); Matter of Fitzpatrick v. Blackall & Baldwin Co. (Id. 671), and Jenkins v. Hogan & Sons, Inc. (177 App. Div. 36), it having been found that the contract of employment was made in the year 1914. All concur, except John M. Kellogg, P. J., dissenting on the authority of Matter of Smith v. Heine Boiler Co. (224 N. Y. 9) and Matter of Gardner v. Horseheads Construction Co. (171 App. Div. 66).
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Claim of Smith v. Heine Safety Boiler Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Claim of Gardner v. Horseheads Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
- Matter of Klein v. . Stoller Cook CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Claim of Jenkins v. T. Hogan & Sons, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gibbs v. R. H. Macy & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
- Claim of Harby v. Marwell Bros.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- Minto v. Hitchings & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
- Claim of Crouse v. KingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
- Claim of Harby v. Marwell Bros.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922