Legal Opinion

Matter of Hospers v. . J. Hungerford Smith Company

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 1, 1921PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered November 15, 1920, affirming an award of the state industrial commission made under the Workmen’s Compensation Law. Claimant’s son received injuries which resulted in his death.

Read the full summary

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered November 15, 1920, affirming an award of the state industrial commission made under the Workmen’s Compensation Law. Claimant’s son received injuries which resulted in his death. He resided at Sheldon, Iowa, and was employed as a traveling salesman by the employer herein, a corporation engaged in the business of manufacturing fruits, syrups and soda fountain sundries, with a plant and principal place of business at Rochester, NT. Y. The contract of employment, the preliminary…

1Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: His cook, Ch. J., Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ.

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Matter of Cameron v. Ellis Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Prendergast v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Claim of Harby v. Marwell Bros.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  4. Claim of Flinn v. Remington Rand, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  5. Claim of Seely v. Phœnix Transit Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API