Legal Opinion

Norman v. Burks

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 21, 1949No. Civ. 16886PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDrapeau, J.

Plaintiff! is a married man, part owner with his wife, in what must have been a lucrative cosmetics business. They built up the business as individuals; later on it was incorporated.

He and his wife fell out. They lived separate and apart; the wife brought an action for divorce, and they entered into a property settlement agreement. He was served with summons and complaint, his default was entered, but the case went no further.

While estranged from his wife, plaintiff met the defendant, who must have been a personable and experienced young woman. Her first marriage in Kansas ended in a divorce.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pereira v. PereiraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Howard v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Goes v. PerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Kirk White & Co. v. Bieg-Hoffine Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
  5. Tryon v. HuntoonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Carr v. Yokohama Specie Bank, Limited, of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
  2. Morris v. MacNabSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  3. Boyd v. BoydCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. Gill v. ShivelyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  5. Langley v. SchumackerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API