Murphy v. Davids
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County denying a motion to offset judgments. John W. Shenb, Judge. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.
This is an appeal by the defendants from an order denying their motion to offset, against the plaintiff’s judgment herein, certain judgments now owned by the defendants against the plaintiff. The judgment in this action recovered by the plaintiff against the defendants in the sum of $15,000 was entered on the seventeenth day of November, 1916. Thereafter the plaintiff assigned this judgment one-fourth to Anderson & Anderson, one-third to the San Bernardino National Bank, and the balance to Elizabeth A. Murphy. This assignment was filed with the clerk of the superior court of Los Angeles…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Doehla v. PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Saunders v. SimmsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- More v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Haskins v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Hall v. CayotCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Jones v. MortimerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Faias v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Tolle v. DoakCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Kneeland v. Ethicon Suture Laboratories, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1952
- Van Denburgh v. GoodfellowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.