Legal Opinion
Tolle v. Doak
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 28, 1936No. Civ. 10162PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EDMONDS, J., pro tem.
The procedure required to be taken by a judgment creditor, more than five years aiter the judgment is entered, to secure the allowance of .the judgment against the estate of the judgment debtor, who £ied in the meantime, is the sole question for consideration in this ease.
In 1923 H. A. Tolle secured a judgment against William C. Doak. In the same year execution was issued upon this judgment and returned nulla bona. In 1933 the defendant died testate and Edward H. Page was appointed and qualified as the executor of his will. In the following year the plaintiff served and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Doehla v. PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Harrier v. BassfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Long v. Chronicle Publishing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1924
- Murphy v. DavidsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Taylor v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Lohman v. LohmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Raps v. RapsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Bank of America v. CarrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Schluter v. SellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
- United States Gypsum Co. v. ShafferCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.