Legal Opinion

Van Denburgh v. Goodfellow

California Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1941No. L. A. 16742PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TRATNOR, J. —

On August 15, 1935, plaintiff Harry G. Van Denburgh, as administrator of the estate of Mrs. Ar thur J. Clark, obtained a judgment against defendants Walter V. Goodfellow and Elizabeth B. Goodfellow, upon a note secured by a mortgage. On September 10, 1935, the mortgaged premises were sold and a deficiency judgment was entered against the defendants. On September 23, 1936, the defendants filed separate petitions in bankruptcy in the Federal District Court, and each was adjudicated a bankrupt. They listed plaintiff’s judgment in the schedule of debts attached to each bankruptcy…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Birkett v. Columbia BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. Friend v. TalcottSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Friend v. TalcottSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Sterling v. GregoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Meyer v. PriceNew York Court of Appeals · 1929

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Matter of RobertsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1981
  2. King v. HarryDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1955
  3. Tyler v. Jones County BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
  4. Ward v. MeyersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  5. Exchange National Bank of Tulsa v. RansomCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API