Hall v. Cayot
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Plumas County. C. E. McLaughlin, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
ANGELLOTTI, J.—
This is an action upon two claims against Phillip Doray, deceased, which were duly presented for allowance to the executor of his will, and which, because of the neglect and failure of such executor to indorse his allowance or rejection thereon within ten days after such presentation, plaintiff elected to consider rejected.
One of the claims was based upon a promissory note of the deceased. The action was commenced on the twenty-fourth day of May, 1900, and on the next day the said claim, having been allowed by the executor, was delivered by him to the judge, allowed by him, and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Brewster v. HartleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Daggett v. RankinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- More v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Spreckels v. Nevada BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Higgins v. MansonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. California Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
- Saunders v. SimmsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- In Re Estate of HellierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Hise v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Beckwith v. SheldonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.