Tobel v. State, Dept. of Public Safety
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
THOMPSON, Presiding Judge.
Plaintiffs, Antone and Judy Tobel, 1 appeal the grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants, City of Tempe (City), State of Arizona (State), and Arizona Department of Public Safety (DPS) (collectively defendants). We conclude that questions of fact exist as to whether defendants breached the duty of care and as to whether Tobel acted with due regard for his own safety. Accordingly, we hold that summary judgment was improperly granted.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
On the night before the accident in question, DPS responded to an automobile accident on…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Markowitz v. Arizona Parks BoardArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Coburn v. City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Mid Kansas Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Wichita v. Dynamic Development Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. ReynoldsArizona Supreme Court · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Bunker's Glass Co. v. Pilkington PlCCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- Tobel v. Travelers InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
- US West Communications, Inc. v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
- In Re Adam P.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- Arizona Department of Revenue v. DoughertyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.