Legal Opinion
Tobel v. Travelers Insurance
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided March 30, 1999No. 1 CA-CV 98-0212PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED OPINION
WEISBERG, Presiding Judge.
¶ 1 Appellants, Antone Lee Tobel and Judy Tobel (“Tobel”), appeal from the trial court’s judgment, based on cross-motions for summary judgment, in favor of appellee, Travelers Insurance Company (“Travelers”). The trial court determined that Tobel was not entitled to underinsured motorist coverage (“UIM”) under a policy issued by Travelers to Tobel’s employer, Barricade Light & Rental, Inc. (“Barricade”), because Tobel was not an insured under the terms of the policy. The court therefore granted Travelers’s cross-motion for summary judgment on that…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Rawlings v. ApodacaArizona Supreme Court · 1986
- Noble v. National American Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1981
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. McMichaelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- Brenner v. Aetna Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
- Gonzalez v. SatrusteguiCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- McMurtry v. Weatherford Hotel, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
- Lennar Corp. v. Transamerica InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
- Argonaut Insurance Co. v. JonesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Vincente Prieto v. Paul Revere Life Insurance Company, a Massachusetts CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Jason W. Bills v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.