Legal Opinion

Kaufman v. Zoning Commission

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided February 7, 1995No. 15021PublishedCited by 79 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, C. J.

This appeal concerns the effect of the affordable housing land use appeals act; General Stat*124utes § 8-SOg;1 on an application for a zone change. The defendant, the zoning commission of the city of Dan-bury (commission), denied the application of the plaintiff, Robert J. Kaufman, to amend the zoning map of *125the city of Danbury to change the classification of the plaintiffs property from RA-40 (1 single-family dwelling per acre) to RA-8 (5 single-family dwellings per acre). The plaintiff appealed from the commission’s *126decision to the Superior Court, which rendered judgment reversing that decision…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. State v. CurcioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  2. American Paper Institute, Inc. v. American Electric Power Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Huck v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Agency of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  4. Feinson v. Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  5. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by79 opinions

  1. Hi-Ho Tower, Inc. v. Com-Tronics, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  2. Harris v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  3. River Bend Associates, Inc. v. Conservation & Inland Wetlands CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  4. Wisniowski v. Planning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
  5. Christian Activities Council, Congregational v. Town CouncilSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API