Legal Opinion

Stacy & Witbeck, Inc. v. City & County of San Francisco

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 2, 1996No. A069340PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ANDERSON, P. J.

This appeal involves the second prong of the question posed in Stacy & Witbeck, Inc. v. City and County of San Francisco (1995) 36 Cal.App.4th 1074 [42 Cal.Rptr.2d 805] (Stacy I): 1 whether a publication filed for a litigation and a nonlitigation purpose is privileged in both the judicial and administrative arenas. The publication in question is a contract claim for overages purportedly incurred on a public works project. In Stacy I we held that the litigation privilege did not bar use of the publication in an administrative action to declare a contractor an…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Silberg v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Rubin v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Kimmel v. GolandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Wilton v. Mountain Wood Homeowners Assn., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1993
  5. Wilson v. San Francisco Redevelopment AgencyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. 1100 PARK LANE ASSOCIATES v. FeldmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  2. Fassberg Construction Co. v. Housing AuthorityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  3. Navellier v. SlettenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  4. Davenport v. DavenportCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. Wentland v. WassCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API