Legal Opinion

Wilson v. San Francisco Redevelopment Agency

California Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1977No. S.F. 23584PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RICHARDSON, J.

This case involves the interaction of several related provisions of the Tort Claims Act (Gov. Code, § 900 et seq.; all further statutory references are to that code unless otherwise indicated). Roughly paraphrased, section 911.2 requires the filing with the appropriate public agency of a claim for death or injury within 100 days of accrual of a cause of action. Under, section 946.4, subdivision (a), however, a failure to file a claim does not bar an action against the public agency if, during the period of 70 days immediately after the cause of action accrues, the agency…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rand v. AndreattaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Elias v. San Bernardino County Flood Control DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  3. Tubbs v. Southern California Rapid Transit DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Rogers v. Board of EducationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Robinson v. Alameda CountyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2012
  2. Santee v. Santa Clara County Office of EducationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  3. Baines Pickwick Ltd. v. the City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  4. Olden v. HatchellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  5. Stacy & Witbeck, Inc. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API