Legal Opinion

Rubin v. Green

California Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1993No. S025858PublishedCited by 241 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ARABIAN, J.

At common law, barratry was “the offense of frequently exciting and stirring up suits and quarrels” (4 Blackstone, Commentaries 134) and was punished as a misdemeanor. A statutory version of the crime survives today, although it is seldom prosecuted, perhaps because of the requirement that the proof show the defendant “excited” at least three groundless suits “with a corrupt or malicious intent to vex and annoy.” (Pen. Code, §§ 158, 159.)

The modern successor of common law barratry, solicitation, is not only, a misdemeanor when accomplished through the use of agents, but is…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Bank of the West v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Silberg v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Moradi-Shalal v. Fireman's Fund Ins. CompaniesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by241 opinions

  1. Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
  2. W. Michael Kimes J. Colette Boykin v. Peter G. Stone, Judge, Superior Court Robert L. Mezzetti, II Henry Mariani Robert MacHadoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  3. Briggs v. Eden Council for Hope & OpportunityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Rusheen v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Jarrow Formulas, Inc. v. LaMarcheCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003

236 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API